4.4 Article

Circulating serum miRNAs as potential biomarkers for nephroblastoma

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 1360-1367

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25481

关键词

circulating miRNA; miR-130b-3p; miR-100-5p; miR-143-3p; serum; Wilms tumor

资金

  1. European Union [600841]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundNephroblastoma (or Wilms tumorWT) is the most common childhood kidney cancer. In Europe, nephroblastoma is treated with preoperative chemotherapy without histological confirmation by biopsy. Therefore, minimal-invasive diagnostic markers confirming nephroblastoma diagnosis are highly warranted. ProcedureIn our study, we aim to identify circulating miRNAs with diagnostic potential for differentiating nephroblastoma from controls. We determined the level of 19 miRNAs in serum of 32 patients with nephroblastoma and 12 controls with quantitative real-time PCR. Three miRNAs were further tested in an independent validation set including sera of patients with renal tumors other than Wilms. ResultsIn total, 14 miRNAs showed significantly higher abundance in serum of patients with nephroblastoma than in controls. The miRNAs with highest diagnostic potentials included miRs-130b-3p, -100-5p, and -143-3p with an AUC of 0.94, 0.90, and 0.89, respectively. A signature based on these three miRNAs to differentiated patients from controls with an accuracy of 84.58%, a sensitivity of 76.67%, and a specificity of 92.5%. Higher expression of miRs-100-5p and -130b-3p was confirmed in an independent validation set. The signature based on miRs-100-5p and -130b-3p differentiated patients with nephroblastoma from healthy controls with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 79.6%, 69.2%, and 90.0%, respectively. ConclusionIn summary, we provide first evidence that serum miR-100-5p and -130b-3p hold potential as biomarker for WT irrespective of the subtype and that expression level of these miRNA in serum is unaffected by differences in serum collection. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1360-1367. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据