4.2 Article

Maternal risk factors for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 1285-1290

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.951624

关键词

Growth restriction; hypertension; necrotizing enterocolitis; preeclampsia; prematurity

资金

  1. NIH/NICHD [K08HD068398-01A1]
  2. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources)
  3. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health) [8UL1TR000170-05]
  4. Harvard University
  5. academic health care centers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between maternal hypertensive disease and other risk factors and the neonatal development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study of infants with NEC from 2008 to 2012. The primary exposure of interest was maternal hypertensive disease, which has been hypothesized to put infants at risk for NEC. Other variables collected included demographics, pregnancy complications, medications and neonatal hospital course. Data were abstracted from medical records. Results: Twenty-eight cases of singleton neonates with NEC and 81 matched controls were identified and analyzed. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome. Fetuses with an antenatal diagnosis of growth restriction were more likely to develop NEC (p = 0.008). Infants with NEC had lower median birth weight than infants without NEC (p = 0.009). Infants with NEC had more late-onset sepsis (p = 0.01) and mortality before discharge (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The factors identified by this case-control study that increased the risk of neonatal NEC included intrauterine growth restriction and lower neonatal birth weight. The primary exposure, hypertensive disease, did not show a significantly increased risk of neonatal NEC; however, there was a nearly two-fold difference observed. Our study was underpowered to detect the observed difference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据