4.2 Article

Effect of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction on endothelial progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 2385-2389

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.697228

关键词

Endothelial progenitor cells; human umbilical cord blood; intrauterine growth restriction; preeclampsia; premature birth

资金

  1. Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Research and Education and Endowment Fund at Wayne State University
  2. Sarnaik Endowment Fund at Children's Hospital of Michigan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) might play important roles in vascular homeostasis. This study evaluated the influence of prematurity, preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) on the EPC population in human umbilical cord blood (CB). Methods: CB was obtained from 19 preterm and 27 term deliveries. Mononuclear cells were isolated by gradient centrifugation and subjected to flow cytometry to obtain percentages of CD45(d) CD34+, CD45(d) CD133+, CD 45(d) CD34+ CD133+, and CD45(d) CD34+ CD133+ VEGFR-2+ cells. Clinical data were obtained using chart review. Results: Percentages of EPCs were comparable between preterm and term cord blood. CD45(d) CD34+ CD133+ cells were significantly decreased in CB samples obtained from women with PE (n = 14) [0.01, (0.00-2.6), [median, (range)], as compared to those without PE (n = 32) [1.74(0.00-3.1)] (p = 0.005). CD45(d) CD133+ CD34- cells were significantly increased in presence of PE [0.43, (0.06-1.38)], (p = 0.002). CD45(d) CD34+ CD133+ cells were significantly decreased in presence of IUGR, with no change in CD45(d) CD133+ CD34- cells. Differences in EPC types associated with PE and IUGR were present only in term CB. Conclusions: Exposure to PE and IUGR is associated with significant changes in EPC population. Future studies are needed to explore the clinical impact of observed changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据