4.2 Article

Higher glycemic variability in very low birth weight newborns is associated with greater early neonatal mortality

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1122-1126

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.624220

关键词

Hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; intensive care; neonates

资金

  1. TEAM programme Polish Registry for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes - nationwide genetic screening for monogenic diabetes
  2. activity 1.2 of the Operational Programme Innovative Economy
  3. Foundation for Development of Polish Pharmacy and Medicine
  4. European Fund of Regional Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the association between mean glycemia and its variability with perinatal mortality in preterm newborns hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Patients admitted to the ICU within the first 12 hours of life, with birth weight <1500 g, at least three blood glucose measurements/day and lack of insulin treatment were evaluated. Association of mean glycemia and its standard deviation (SD) with death during initial 7 days of life was evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed twice, using continuous glucose concentrations and by means of a quintile-based approach correcting for nonnormal distribution and nonlinear effects. Results: A total of 95 newborns were enrolled. Eleven patients (11.5%) died during the initial 7 days of life, overall mortality equaled 22%. Multivariate analysis showed that 5 minute Apgar score and SD of glucose concentrations were significantly associated with increased mortality in both models. Odds ratios (ORs) equaled 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.27-0.74 and OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03-2.03 for the continuous model and 0.50 95% CI 0.34-0.75 and OR 1.82 95% CI 1.07-3.11 for the quintile-based model. In both cases, mean glycemia was removed during the stepwise model-building procedure. Conclusions: Higher glycemic variability may be associated with greater odds of perinatal mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据