4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Is maternal diabetes a risk factor for childhood obesity?

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.626927

关键词

Customized growth percentiles fetal origins of adult disease; large-for-gestational age infants

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD [K12 HD-01254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Our objective is to determine if there is a relationship between diabetes during pregnancy and childhood obesity, in our inner-city, African-American population. Methods: Pertinent child, neonatal and maternal pregnancy and delivery data were collected from mothers of children age 2-5 years old. Outcome variable definition was based on children's body mass index (BMI) subgroups; independent variable definition on birth-weight subgroups based on customized growth percentiles. Covariates included pre and postnatal factors. Those covariates marginally related to diabetes (p < 0.2) by bivariate analyses, were allowed to compete in logistic regression, with p < 0.05 significant. Results: Four hundred and ninety-three patients were enrolled, of which 35 (7.1%) had diabetes during pregnancy. Children of diabetic mothers were more likely to be obese at age 2-5 years than those of non-diabetics (p = 0.004). Five of 20 covariates had p < 0.2 in bivariate setting. Following stepwise logistic regression, diabetes and maternal prepregnancy BMI were significant determinants of childhood obesity. When large-for-gestational age (LGA) was added into the model, diabetes was no longer significant (p = 0.105); only LGA (p = 0.008) and maternal prepregnancy BMI (p = 0.032) were significantly associated with childhood obesity. Conclusions: In our inner-city, primarily African-American population, diabetes in pregnancy is significantly related to childhood obesity at age 2-5 years. Well-controlled diabetes during pregnancy that avoids macrosomia may lead to prevention of future childhood obesity as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据