4.6 Article

Enhancement of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene)/poly(styrene sulfonate) properties by poly(vinyl alcohol) and doping agent as conductive nano-thin film for electronic application

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-013-1188-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion
  2. National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission [EN283A]
  3. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund (CU-CLUSTER-FUND)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the integration of the useful concepts of polymer blending and doping agent to simultaneously improve various properties of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxy thiophene) poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) nano-thin films was shown. According to the polymer-blending concept, insulating poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) has a good deal of potential to be utilized as a filler to improve the critical properties of the PEDOT:PSS matrix, especially conductivity, wettability, and thermal and mechanical properties. At the appropriate amount of PVA, 0.08 wt%, it acts as a binder to improve the connection network between PEDOT:PSS chains, leading to a maximum conductivity of 1.18 S/cm, and also providing a good contact angle of 8.8A degrees. The transmission of the films decreased with increasing PVA content; however, all specimens still showed excellent transmittance values of more than 80 %. The thermal stability and the resistance to abrasion of the nano-thin conductive films were improved by strong covalent bonds between PVA and PSS, which were verified by TGA and a scratching test, respectively. In addition, the relationship of PEDOT:PSS properties versus various amounts of insulating PVA for practical usage for specific electronic fields were shown. Use of the doping agent quinoxaline was aimed to particularly enhance the conductivity of PEDOT:PSS. The highest conductivity (2.75 S/cm) was achieved when 0.5 wt% quinoxaline was added into 0.08 wt% PVA/PEDOT:PSS while the other properties were not significantly altered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据