4.7 Article

A facile synthesis of supported amorphous iron oxide with high performance for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution under visible light irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 323-329

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.061

关键词

Chromium(VI) removal; Iron oxide; Photoreduction; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372200]
  2. PHD Research Startup Foundation of Xi'an University of Technology [108-451117003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of supported iron oxide nanoparticles were prepared by impregnation with Fe(NO3)(3) supported on TiO2, followed by low-temperature calcination. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra and BET have been used to characterize the samples. These iron oxide-impregnated TiO2 were examined for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). The experiments demonstrated that Cr(VI) in aqueous solution was more efficiently reduced using Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts than either pure Fe2O3 or TiO2 under visible light irradiation. All TiO2 supported samples were somewhat active for visible light photoreduction. With an optimal mole ratio of 0.05-Fe/Ti, the highest rate of Cr(VI) reduction was achieved under the experimental conditions. We also compared the photoreactivity of TiO2 supported iron oxide samples with that supported on Al2O3 and ZrO2. It can be noted that iron oxide nanoparticles deposited on high surface area supports to increase the solid-liquid contact area renders it considerably more active. Noticeably, iron oxide cluster size and dispersion are important parameters in synthesizing active, supported Iron oxide nanoparticles. In addition, the interaction between iron oxide and TiO2 was proposed as the source of photoactivity for Cr(VI) reduction. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据