4.6 Article

Branched versus linear perfluorocarbon chains in the formation of superhydrophobic electrodeposited films with low bioaccumulative potential

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 49, 期 22, 页码 7760-7769

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8487-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS [KAKENHI] [23685034]
  2. RCUK [through EPSRC] [EP/K020676/1]
  3. G8 Research Councils Initiative on Multilateral Research Funding - G8-2012 [ANR-13-G8ME-0003]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K020676/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K020676/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23685034] Funding Source: KAKEN
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-G8ME-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work concerns the replacing of long and linear perfluorocarbon chains by branched ones to reduce the bioaccumulative potentials of fluorinated materials. Here, novel 3,4-propylenedioxythiophene monomers containing a branched perfluorocarbon chain or a linear perfluorocarbon chain with the same number of C-F bonds are synthesized and used to produce superhydrophobic films by electropolymerization. The branching induces higher steric hindrance during electropolymerization, which reduces the mean polymer backbone length, decreases the polymer electrical conductivity, and changes the surface morphology. Here, we show that these changes can be beneficial in the case of super liquid-repellent properties. Indeed, superhydrophobic properties are obtained with linear and branched perfluorocarbon chains. However, while superoleophilic properties are obtained with both linear perfluorocarbon chains, much higher oleophobic properties are obtained with branched perfluorocarbon chains. Here, the differences are due to changes in the surface morphology and roughness. This work opens new strategies to obtain surfaces with high hydrophobicity and oleophobicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据