4.6 Article

Effect of filler content on morphology and physical-chemical characteristics of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/NaY zeolite-filled membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 3361-3370

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8043-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER through the COMPETE Program
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011]
  3. project Matepro-Optimizing Materials and Processes [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000037]
  4. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte'' (ON.2-O Novo Norte), under the Quadro de Referencia Estrategico Nacional'' (QREN), through the Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional'' (FEDER)
  5. FCT [SFRH/BD/62507/2009, SFRH/BPD/90870/2012, SFRH/BPD/63148/2009]
  6. COST Action [MP0902]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/62507/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) electrospun membranes have been prepared with different NaY zeolite contents up to 32 wt%. Inclusion of zeolites induces an increase of average fiber size from similar to 200 nm in the pure polymer up to similar to 500 nm in the composite with 16 wt% zeolite content. For higher filler contents, a wider distribution of fibers occurs leading to a broader size distribution between the previous fiber size values. Hydrophobicity of the membranes increases from similar to 115A(0) water contact angle to similar to 128A(0) with the addition of the filler and is independent on filler content, indicating a wrapping of the zeolite by the polymer. The water contact angle further increases with fiber alignment up to similar to 137A degrees. Electrospun membranes are formed with similar to 80 % of the polymer crystalline phase in the electroactive beta phase, independently on the electrospinning processing conditions or filler content. Viability of MC3T3-E1 cells on the composite membranes after 72 h of cell culture indicates the suitability of the membranes for tissue engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据