4.6 Article

On the importance of the structure in the electrical conductivity of fishbone carbon nanofibers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 1423-1435

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6893-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER
  2. Spanish MICINN [CTQ2011-28913-C02-01]
  3. bilateral CNR (Italy)-CSIC (Spain) joint agreement [2010IT0026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have a remarkable electrical conductivity resulting highly attractive for different applications such as composites or electronics due to their high quality/price ratio. Although it is known that their graphitic character provides a high conductivity, very little is known about the influence of the nanofibers structure on that property. In this study, CNFs characterized by different physical properties are prepared at diverse synthesis temperatures within a range (550-750 degrees C) in which significant structural and dimensional changes are accomplished and homogeneous nanofiber growth takes place. The electrical conductivity is determined on the powdery as-grown materials modifying the compaction degree by applying pressure. Because of a combination of structural features, the apparent electrical conductivity increases with synthesis temperature of CNFs, ranging from 50 S m(-1) for the worst conducting CNFs at a low compaction degree (25 % of solid volume fraction) to 3 x 10(3) S m(-1) for the best conducting CNFs at a high compaction degree (60 % of solid volume fraction). Further analysis is carried out applying the percolation theory to analyze the experimental data and the results suggest that both the orientation of the graphenes and the filament diameter distribution play a determining role in the intrinsic electrical conductivity with values in the interval 1.5 x 10(3) to 1.3 x 10(4) S m(-1). These intrinsic values of electrical conductivity are found between one and two orders of magnitude higher than that of the powder, highlighting the also important effect of porosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据