4.6 Article

Electrospinning preparation of LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures and their photoluminescence properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 2557-2565

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-7046-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 50972020, 51072026]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20102216110002, 20112216120003]
  3. Science and Technology Development Planning Project of Jilin Province [20070402, 20060504]
  4. Key Research Project of Science and Technology of Ministry of Education of China [207026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tb3+-doped LaOBr nanostructures including nanofibers, nanobelts, and hollow nanofibers were synthesized for the first time via calcinating the electrospun polyvinyl pyrrolidone/[La(NO3)(3) + Tb(NO3)(3) + NH4Br] composites. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures are tetragonal in structure with space group of P4/nmm. The morphologies and sizes of LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures were investigated using scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope. Under the excitation of 254-nm ultraviolet light, LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures exhibit the green emissions of predominant peak at 543 nm, which is ascribed to D-5(4) -> F-7(5) transition of Tb3+ ions. It is found that the optimum doping concentration of Tb3+ ions in the LaOBr:Tb3+ nanofibers is 3 %. Interestingly, we found that the luminescence intensity of hollow nanofibers is obviously greater than that of nanofibers and nanobelts for LaOBr:Tb3+ under the same measuring conditions. Moreover, the luminescence of LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures are located in the green region in Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage chromaticity coordinates diagram. The formation mechanisms of LaOBr:Tb3+ nanofibers, nanobelts, and hollow nanofibers were also proposed. LaOBr:Tb3+ nanostructures are promising nanomaterials for applications in the fields of light display systems and optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据