4.6 Article

Fabrication and characterization of electrospun Ag doped TiO2 nanofibers for photocatalytic reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 46, 期 22, 页码 7240-7246

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-5683-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20114010100090] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Republic of Korea [B0010495] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06B1611] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium dioxide is one of the best semiconductor photocatalysts available for photocatalytic reaction of dye pollutants. To prevent the recombination caused by the relatively low photocatalytic efficiency, Ag doped TiO2 nanofiber was prepared by electrospinning method. The photocatalysts (pure TiO2 nanofiber and Ag doped TiO2 nanofiber) were characterized by FE-SEM, XRD, XPS, and PL analysis. These photocatalysts were evaluated by the photodecomposition of methylene blue under UV light. Ag doped TiO2 nanofiber was found to be more efficient than pure TiO2 fiber for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. The photocatalytic degradation rate was applied to pseudo-first-order equation. The degradation of Ag doped TiO2 nanofiber was significantly higher than the degradation rate of pure TiO2 nanofiber. Activation energy was calculated by applying Arrhenius equation from the rate constant of photocatalytic reaction. The activation energies for the pure TiO2 nanofibers calcined at 400 and 500 A degrees C were 16.981 and 12.187 kJ/mol and those of Ag doped TiO2 nanofibers were 18.317 and 7.977 kJ/mol, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据