4.6 Article

Morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of polypropylene-nanoclay composites prepared from masterbatch in a twin screw extruder

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 46, 期 18, 页码 6075-6086

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-5570-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering Research Center
  2. Scientific Research and Research Center-College of Engineering at King Saud University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A commercial homopolymer polypropylene was melt blended with commercial nanoclay masterbatch at different concentrations of nanoclay using twin screw extruder (TSE). The influence of three different concentrations (5, 10, and 15 wt%) of the nanoclay on the morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties was investigated. The morphology of the nanocomposites was characterized using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), whereas, the thermal behavior (e.g., melting and crystallization) was characterized using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The melt rheology and dynamic mechanical properties were analyzed using a torsional rheometer. Additionally, the tensile properties were characterized as well. The morphological analysis showed that the nanoclay was well distributed in the PP matrix as indicated by the SEM micrographs. The DSC results showed that the presence of nanoclay in the PP matrix increased the degree of crystallinity of PP-nanoclay composites, which reached a maximum at 5 wt% of nanoclay concentration. However, the melting temperature of the PP-nanoclay composites was not affected by the presence of nanoclay particles. In addition, rheological analysis showed that the melt response gradually changed from pseudo-liquid like to pseudo-solid like as the nanoclay concentration increased. Moreover, the storage modulus (G') increased by increasing nanoclay content. Furthermore, tensile test results showed that the addition of nanoclay leads to a significant enhancement in the mechanical properties of the PP nanocomposites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据