4.6 Article

Modelling of the effects of welding conditions on dilution of stainless steel claddings produced by gas metal arc welding procedures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 196, 期 1-3, 页码 339-344

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.060

关键词

stainless steel cladding; austenitic stainless steel; resistive heating; response surface methodology; dilution; numerical optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper highlights an experimental study carried out to analyse the effects of various gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and universal gas metal arc welding (UGMAW) process parameters on dilution in single layer stainless steel cladding of low carbon structural steel plates. Four factors five levels central composite rotatable design was used to develop relationship for predicting dilution, which enables to quantify the direct and interactive effects of four numeric factors i.e. wire feed rate, open circuit voltage, welding speed and nozzle-to-plate distance and one categorical factor preheat current. This comparative study reveals that dilution obtained in UGMAW process is significantly lower than that with GMAW process due to external preheating of the filler wire in UGMAW process which results in greater contribution of arc energy by resistive heating and as a consequence, significant drop in the main welding current values in case of UGMAW process is observed. Mathematical models developed show that dilution increases with increase in wire feed rate, open circuit voltage and welding speed, whereas it decreases with increase in nozzle-to-plate distance and preheat current. Furthermore the optimization capabilities in design-expert software were used to numerically optimize the input parameters and the optimal solutions generated indicate that for same levels of dilution, higher deposition rates were achieved in UGMAW process thus establishing that UGMAW process can prove to be a good choice for low cost surfacing applications. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据