4.5 Article

Structure and Properties of Ti-19.7Nb-5.8Ta Shape Memory Alloy Subjected to Thermomechanical Processing Including Aging

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-013-0555-6

关键词

biomaterials; electron microscopy; heat treating; mechanical testing; rolling; titanium

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the ternary Ti-19.7Nb-5.8Ta (at.%) alloy for biomedical applications was studied. The ingot was manufactured by vacuum arc melting with a consumable electrode and then subjected to hot forging. Specimens were cut from the ingot and processed by cold rolling with e = 0.37 of logarithmic thickness reduction and post-deformation annealing (PDA) between 400 and 750 A degrees C (1 h). Selected samples were subjected to aging at 300 A degrees C (10 min to 3 h). The influence of the thermomechanical processing on the alloy's structure, phase composition, and mechanical and functional properties was studied. It was shown that thermomechanical processing leads to the formation of a nanosubgrained structure (polygonized with subgrains below 100 nm) in the 500-600 A degrees C PDA range, which transforms to a recrystallized structure of beta-phase when PDA temperature increases. Simultaneously, the phase composition and the beta A -> A I +/- aEuro(3) transformation kinetics vary. It was found that after conventional cold rolling and PDA, Ti-Nb-Ta alloy manifests superelastic and shape memory behaviors. During aging at 300 A degrees C (1 h), an important quantity of randomly scattered equiaxed omega-precipitates forms, which results in improved superelastic cyclic properties. On the other hand, aging at 300 A degrees C (3 h) changes the omega-precipitates' particle morphology from equiaxed to elongated and leads to their coarsening, which negatively affects the superelastic and shape memory functional properties of Ti-Nb-Ta alloy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据