4.5 Article

Study on imaging method for measuring droplet size in large sprays

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 100-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2014.12.003

关键词

Digital image; Spray size; Wide size distribution; Large droplets

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51206112, 51327803, 51176128]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [12ZR1446900]
  3. Innovation Project of Scientific Research of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [12YZ110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information of droplet size and size distribution lays the basis for investigations of atomization mechanisms and performance optimization. However, the laser diffraction and phase Doppler particle analyzers have difficulty in accurately characterizing sprays with a wide range of droplet sizes and very large droplets, especially if a large number of droplets are aspherical. A method to measure size in such large-droplet sprays based on digital imaging with backward illumination was developed, including an image acquisition system and image process programs. Calibration of the measurement system was performed using a dot calibration target with different dot sizes. An experimental setup was designed and established to characterize spray nozzles under different operation loads, as well as different nozzle arrangements. Results show that the droplet size of sprays ranges from dozens of microns to several millimeters. The superiority of wide load range for such nozzles was indicated by the size-measurement results under half-load to full-load operations. The present study revealed that the image processing technique can be effectively implemented for in-line size measurements of sprays with a wide distribution of droplet size and aspherical droplets, which would be difficult to characterize by other methods. (C) 2015 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据