4.5 Article

TSP aerosol source apportionment in the urban region of the Indian steel city, Rourkela

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 124-133

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2014.07.006

关键词

Aerosol; TSP; Enrichment factor analysis; Steel city; Chemical mass balance model

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST) as part of the Fast Track Scheme for Young Scientist [SR/FTP/ES-76/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steel industries are a major contributor to aerosols in steel cities like Rourkela. We designed an air quality sampling program to characterize total suspended particulate (TSP) aerosol in urban areas of Rourkela and to identify their steel-related and other sources. Monitoring was carried out over 8 h, twice per week from January 2011 to December 2012. Metallic species of TSP aerosols were analyzed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer; ionic species using the IS 3025 method; and carbonaceous species using a total organic carbon analyzer. Enrichment factor and Spearman's rank correlation analysis were carried out on compositional data. Significant seasonal variations were observed for TSP with totals in summer > spring > winter > monsoon. Low concentrations during monsoon reflected wet scavenging, while high concentrations during summer were related to wind turbulence and low humidity. The chemical mass balance model CMB8.2 was applied to apportion sources. Particles related to steel production, road dust, and soil were dominant in all seasons. A fertilizer plant was found to contribute particles in summer and monsoon. Wood combustion, diesel exhaust, and liquefied petroleum gas contributed significantly in spring and winter. While diesel exhaust, industrial manufacturing, solid waste burning, cement kilns, and construction were found to contribute to TSP at various times throughout the year. (c) 2014 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据