4.3 Article

Fabrication of small organic luminogens honeycomb-structured films with aggregation-induced emission features

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 31, 页码 15869-15873

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm32730a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Fund for Fundamental Key Projects [2011CB935700, 2010CB934700, 2009CB930404, 2012CB933200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [21003138, 21121001, 20920102036, 20974113, 91127025]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-M01]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [603509, HKUST2/CRF/10, 604711, N_HKUST620/11]
  5. University Grants Committee of Hong Kong [AoE/P-03/08]
  6. HKUST [RPC11SC09, SRF11SC03PG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the successful fabrication of honeycomb structure by breath figure (BF) process from the small molecule tetraphenylethene (TPE) derivatives, showing an extraordinary phenomenon of aggregation-induced emission (AIE). In this process, TPE derivatives with the twist and non-planar substituted groups are chosen; TPE units are easier to become amorphous than crystalline. This is critical for gaining the viscosity and stabilizing the water droplets during evaporation. Characteristics of the confocal fluorescence and the fluorescent spectrum indicate that these honeycomb structures are highly emissive due to the AIE feature of TPE derivatives. These structures lead to a small red-shift of the photoluminescence compared to the smooth film. The success of fabricating TPE derivatives honeycomb structure may, for certain applications, represent an advance with respect to the more commonly used polymers, due to the inherent drawbacks of polymers such as phase separation, non-reproducibility of molecular weight distribution from batch to batch. These findings should open a way for the development of the honeycomb structure material with small organic molecules. Such a structure will be useful in many areas, such as sensors, microelectronics, optoelectronics and even biomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据