4.3 Article

Polypyrrole metacomposites with different carbon nanostructures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 4996-5005

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm14020a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF-National Science Foundation-Chemical and Biological Separation under the EAGER [CBET 11-37441]
  2. National Science Foundation-Nanoscale Interdisciplinary Research Team and Materials Processing and Manufacturing [CMMI 10-30755]
  3. NSF [DMR 10-05764]
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1030755] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polypyrrole (PPy) nanocomposites incorporating different carbon nanostructures (CNS), including graphenes of different sizes, carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), have been successfully synthesized using a surface initiated polymerization (SIP) method. The effects of graphene size, loading level and surface functionality on the electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity of their corresponding nanocomposites have been systematically studied. The electron transportation mechanism has been investigated, which follows a quasi 3-d variable range hopping (VRH) behavior in the nanocomposites. Meanwhile, CNFs and CNTs with the same loading as graphene are also comparatively studied. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy results indicate that the PPy coating on one-dimensional carbon nanostructures, such as CNFs and CNTs, is more smooth and uniform than that on the two-dimensional graphenes. PPy/CNTs nanocomposites exhibit the lowest resistivity, followed by the composites incorporating the smaller sized graphene without surfactant. More interestingly, a negative permittivity is found in each composite system, which can be easily controlled by adjusting the nanofiller loading, morphology and surface functionality. TGA results indicate that the thermal stability of the polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) is affected by the graphene loading rather than the different nanostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据