4.3 Article

Birnessite-type manganese oxides nanosheets with hole acceptor assisted photoelectrochemical activity in response to visible light

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 2733-2739

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm14355g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education
  2. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development under AFOSR
  3. National Science Council
  4. National Taiwan University
  5. Academia Sinica, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cost-effective and simple electroplating technique has been developed to prepare layered manganese oxide (MnO2) arrays as a promising material for solar hydrogen production and waste-water cleaning through photoelectrochemical (PEC) process. The microstructure of these MnO2 nanosheets can be referenced to Birnessite-type, as characterized by Raman spectra and transmission electron microscopy. The bandgap energy of the as-grown nanosheets determined from UV-vis spectroscopy is about 2.1 eV. Mott-Schottky plots show the flat band potential of the MnO2 nanosheets to be -0.01 V and a donor concentration of 4.68 x 10(20) cm(-3). Remarkable photocurrent in response to visible light is observed in the presence of hole acceptors, such as sodium formate and methanol, which efficiently suppress the recombination loss of electron-hole pairs from localized d-d transitions within manganese ion. Meanwhile, the transient photocurrent-time responses and the effect of different hole acceptors on PEC activity are studied with an increase of respective hole acceptor concentration, and the results reveal the critical role in the process of absorption and decomposition of the hole acceptor. Significantly, the MnO2 nanosheets exhibit an incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency of 7% in response to the monochromatic wavelength of 400 nm, which is comparable to that from hematite (alpha-Fe2O3). These results demonstrate the nanoporous MnO2 nanosheets have great potential in solar hydrogen applications and organic pollutant cleaning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据