4.3 Article

Electronic and optical properties of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 33, 页码 16964-16970

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm32321d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering-Research Exchanges
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. China Awards
  5. India Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional covalent organic films with a macrocyclic network were recently synthesized experimentally under simple solvothermal conditions [J. W. Colson et al., Science, 2011, 332, 228], which offers immense potential for optoelectronic applications as in the case of graphene. Here we systematically investigate the electronic and optical properties of such novel covalent organic frameworks (COF-5, TP-COF and NiPc-PBBA COF) as free-standing sheets using density-functional theory. The results shed considerable light on the nature of spatial carrier confinement with band offset. COF-5 exhibits a type-II heterojunction alignment with significant valence and conduction band offsets, suggesting an effective spatial carrier separation of electrons and holes. In TP-COF, the valence offset is close to zero, related to the dispersed distribution of photoexcited holes over the entire structure, while the conduction band offset is still remarkable, indicating the effective confinement of photoexcited electrons. NiPc-PBBA COF presents a type-I heterojunction alignment where the band-edged wave functions are localized in the same region, achieving effective spatial carrier congregation. The calculated absorption peaks of the optical absorption of TP-COF and NiPc-PBBA COF frameworks are in agreement with experimental measurements, thus providing theoretical insights into experimental observed transmission spectra of these frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据