4.3 Article

Luminescence tuning of MOFs via ligand to metal and metal to metal energy transfer by co-doping of (2)(infinity)[Gd2Cl6(bipy)(3)]center dot 2bipy with europium and terbium

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 20, 页码 10179-10187

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm15571k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP-1362]
  2. University of Munich (LMU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The series of anhydrous lanthanide chlorides LnCl(3), Ln = Pr-Tb, and 4,4'-bipyridine (bipy) constitute isotypic MOFs of the formula (2)(infinity)[Ln(2)Cl(6)(bipy)(3)]center dot 2bipy. The europium and terbium containing compounds both exhibit luminescence of the referring trivalent lanthanide ions, giving a red luminescence for Eu3+ and a green luminescence for Tb3+ triggered by an efficient antenna effect of the 4,4'-bipyridine linkers. Mixing of different lanthanides in one MOF structure was undertaken to investigate the potential of this MOF system for colour tuning of the luminescence. Based on the gadolinium containing compound, co-doping with different amounts of europium and terbium proves successful and yields solid solutions of the formula (2)(infinity)[Gd2-x-yEuxTbyCl6(bipy)(3)]center dot 2bipy (1-8), 0 <= x, y <= 0.5. The series of MOFs exhibits the opportunity of tuning the emission colour in-between green and red. Depending on the atomic ratio Gd:Eu:Tb, the yellow region was covered for the first time for an oxygen/carboxylate-free MOF system. In addition to a ligand to metal energy transfer (LMET) from the lowest ligand-centered triplet state of 4,4'-bipyridine, a metal to metal energy transfer (MMET) between 4f-levels from Tb3+ to Eu3+ is as well vital for the emission colour. However, no involvement of Gd3+ in energy transfers is observed rendering it a suitable host lattice ion and connectivity centre for diluting the other two rare earth ions in the solid state. The materials retain their luminescence during activation of the MOFs for microporosity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据