4.3 Article

Doping of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: antifouling effect observed at ultralow concentrations of TiO2 nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 28, 页码 10311-10320

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm11040c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. FWO-Vlaanderen Republic of Korea and Belgium [F01-2009-000-10045-0]
  3. Regional Government of Madrid [S2009/AMB-1588]
  4. European Union, Romanian Government
  5. Dunarea de Jos University of Galati [POSDRU-6/1.5/S/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping of nanofiltration membranes with TiO2 nanoparticles was studied in the ultralow concentration range, in the absence of photocatalysis. Blended polyethersulfone/ TiO2 flat-sheet membranes were manufactured and investigated in terms of pure water flux, permeability, fouling resistance and solute rejection. The membranes were synthesized at four different polymer concentrations by the phase inversion method, using 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and deionized water as solvent and coagulant, respectively. The influence of TiO2 addition was investigated in an unusually low concentration interval (0.035-0.375 wt%). The membrane morphology was studied by determining particle size distributions of TiO2 to explore the effect of nanoparticle aggregation. Furthermore, membranes were characterized by hydrophilicity (contact angle), morphology (SEM), porosity, mechanical strength (bursting pressure) and thermal analysis (TGA). Membrane fouling was studied with humic acids as model organic foulants. Overall, a remarkable improvement in the permeability was observed with the addition of ultralow amounts of nanoparticles to the polymer. The optimum permeability was found to be as low as 0.085 wt%, using a constant rejection of dyes as the boundary condition. It was shown that rejection of solutes is not negatively influenced by the increase in permeability. In addition, the resistance against membrane fouling was found to be above 12% for the TiO2 blended membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据