4.5 Article

Optical coherence tomography as a tool to evaluate retinal changes in Parkinson's disease

期刊

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1164-1169

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.002

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Retina; Optical coherence tomography (OCT); Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL); Central macular thickness (CMT); Central and total macular volumes (TMV)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Though Parkinson's disease (PD) is primarily a disease of the basal ganglia, recent evidence suggests that PD affects the retina. Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and thickness and volume of the macula in PD and hence explore the utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in studying retinal changes in PD. Methods: A prospective, hospital based evaluation of 30 patients with PD and 30 healthy controls was carried out. Various parameters such as RNFL, central macular thickness (CMT), central and total macular volumes (TMV) and retinal thickness were analyzed using OCT. Results: (a) RNFL thickness was not significantly different between the patients and controls. A significant negative correlation was found between the RNFL thickness in the right nasal superior sector and the UPDRS motor score. (b) CMT was found to be significantly reduced in the right eye and a negative correlation with the UPDRS motor score was noted. (c) TMV was significantly greater in patients compared to the controls. (d) The outer retinal layer in the right nasal quadrant and the right inferior quadrants were found to be significantly thinner in patients with PD. Conclusions: We did not find any significant abnormality in the RNFL thickness in patients with PD. Decreased CMT in patients with PD and a significant negative correlation of RNFL thickness and CMT with severity of PD suggest a remote possibility of dopaminergic depletion in the retina. However long term studies are warranted to validate our findings. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据