4.3 Article

Optimization of mesoporous carbon structures for lithium-sulfur battery applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 41, 页码 16603-16610

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm12979a

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [KC020105-FWP12152]
  2. Battelle [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous carbon (MC) with tunable pore sizes (22 nm, 12 nm, 7 nm, and 3 nm) and pore volumes (from 1.3 to 4.8 cm(3) g(-1)) containing sulfur in the pores was studied as a mesoporous carbon-sulfur (MCS) composite electrode for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. Systematic investigation of these MCS composites reveals that MC with a larger pore volume can hold a higher maximum sulfur loading, but overall the battery performance is very similar for different MCS composites at full sulfur-filling conditions (i.e., the condition at which the sulfur loading approaches the maximum limit set by the pore volume of the individual MC and, therefore, the pores of each MC are fully filled by sulfur). For the same MC, partial sulfur-filling (i.e., the condition at which the sulfur loading is lower than the maximum limit and, therefore, the pores are only partially filled with sulfur) leads to an improved initial discharge capacity and cycle stability, probably because of improved electrical and ionic transport during electrochemical reactions. Based on this understanding, an MCS composite electrode using MC with a large pore volume, partial sulfur filling, and a novel surface modification was designed for Li-S batteries. An initial capacity of similar to 1390 mA h g(-1) (based on sulfur) and a capacity retention of similar to 840 mA h g(-1) over 100 cycles at a 0.1 C rate were obtained using MC (22 nm, 4.8 cm(3) g(-1)) with 50 wt% sulfur loading and a commercially available Clevios P (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDT/PSS)) coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据