4.3 Article

Nanoparticles enwrapped with nanotubes: A unique architecture of CdS/titanate nanotubes for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production from water

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 13, 页码 5134-5141

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm03945d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [50821064, 91010012]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB220000]
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CdS/titanate nanotubes (CdS/TNTs) photocatalysts with a unique morphology were successfully synthesized via a simple one-step hydrothermal method. Compared with traditional CdS@TNTs composite photocatalysts prepared by the common two-step method, CdS/TNTs exhibited much higher activity for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that the CdS nanoparticle was intimately enwrapped by the surrounding TNTs. This unique architecture resulted in the appropriate dispersion of CdS nanoparticles and the intimate multipoint contacts between the CdS nanoparticle and TNTs, which led to significant enhancement of charge separation in CdS/TNTs. Accordingly, the photoactivity was improved. Meanwhile, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) demonstrated that the highly crystalline hexagonal CdS was obtained in CdS/TNTs, which was also essential for the enhanced photocatalytic performance. The unique morphology and photocatalytic activity of CdS/TNTs were influenced by the Cd/Ti molar ratio with an optimal value of 0.05. Under this condition, the CdS amount was only 6 wt% of the total photocatalyst, which was important from an environmental point of view. The influence of loaded Pt on the activity of CdS/TNTs had also been investigated. The hydrogen production rate of 2.0 wt% Pt-loaded CdS/TNTs reached 353.4 mu mol h(-1), with the apparent quantum yield of 25.5% at 420 nm. This study provides a potential way to synthesize highly efficient composite photocatalysts with a novel architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据