4.3 Article

The use of combinatorial aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition for the formation of gallium-indium-oxide thin films

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 34, 页码 12644-12649

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm11606a

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/H00064X]
  2. EPSRC [EP/F035675/1, EP/H00064X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H00064X/1, EP/F035675/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a novel combinatorial aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition (cAACVD) technique to deposit gallium-doped indium oxide thin films. The oxide films, GaxIn2-xO3 (where x = 0.4-1.6) were deposited within composition graduated films from the aerosol-assisted CVD of GaMe3, InMe3 and HOCH2CH2OMe. Amorphous Ga2O3 was deposited closest to the inlet from the bubbler containing GaMe3/HOCH2CH2OMe whereas crystalline In2O3 was grown on the substrate closest to the inlet from the bubbler containing InMe3/HOCH2CH2OMe. A range of gallium-indium-oxide compositions, GaxIn(2-x)O(3), were deposited on the substrate in the region between the two inlets. This allowed for a systematic investigation on the effect of doping on gallium and indium oxide and a direct relationship between composition and conductivity of the films was observed. The films were characterised via X-ray diffraction (XRD) mapping, energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and conductivity measurements. The lattice parameters for crystalline films are sensitive to composition and were determined to range from a = 10.091 to 10.057 angstrom. This is to our knowledge the first time that a combinatorial aerosol-assisted CVD method has been described. This provides a rapid route to investigate the effect of a dopant on the functional properties of a wide range of materials. Moreover, since it is a solution-based technique, films with a range of compositions could be deposited even if volatile precursors are not available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据