4.3 Article

A theoretical discussion on the relationships among molecular packings, intermolecular interactions, and electron transport properties for naphthalene tetracarboxylic diimide derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 39, 页码 15558-15566

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm12483h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20903020]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0714]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB623605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three naphthalene tetracarboxylic diimide derivatives 1-3 with high electron mobilities and long-term ambient stabilities were investigated employing Marcus-Levich-Jortner formalism at the density functional theory (DFT) level. The complicated relationships among molecular packings, intermolecular interactions, and transport properties for these compounds were focused on and analyzed through investigating the sensitivities of transfer integrals to intermolecular relative orientations, the optimizations of the major transport pathways and the calculations of intermolecular interaction energies by using dispersion-corrected DFT. The results show that the transfer integrals are sensitive to the subtle changes of relative orientations of molecules, especially for core-chlorinated compounds, and there is an interplay between intermolecular interaction and molecular packing. It is found that the transfer integrals associated with the molecular packing motifs of these systems determine their electron mobilities. Interestingly, further discussions on band structures, the anisotropies and temperature dependences of mobilities, and the comparisons of mobilities before and after optimization indicate that the intermolecular packing motifs in the film state may be different from those in the crystalline state for 2. Finally, we hope that our conjecture would facilitate the future design and preparation of high-performance charge-transport materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据