4.3 Article

Electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolicacid)/halloysite nanotube composite nanofibers for drug encapsulation and sustained release

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 47, 页码 10622-10629

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm01328e

关键词

-

资金

  1. 111 Project [B07024]
  2. Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB936000]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a novel electrospun composite nanofiber-based drug delivery system. In this study, halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) were first used to encapsulate a model drug, tetracycline hydrochloride. Then, the drug-loaded HNTs with an optimized encapsulation efficiency were mixed with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymer for subsequent electrospinning to form drug-loaded composite nanofibrous mats. The structure, morphology, and mechanical properties of the formed electrospun composite nanofibrous mats were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and tensile testing. In vitro drug release behavior was examined using UV-vis spectroscopy. The biocompatibility of HNT-containing PLGA fibers was evaluated through cell culture and MTT assay. We show that the incorporation of HNTs within the nanofibrous mats does not significantly change the morphology of the mats. In addition, our results indicate that this double-container drug delivery system (both PLGA polymer and HNTs are drug carriers) is beneficial to reduce the burst release of the drug and the introduction of HNTs can significantly improve the tensile strength of the polymer nanofibrous mats. Given the proved biocompatibility of the HNT-containing PLGA nanofibers via MTT assay of cell viability and SEM observation of cell morphology, the drug loaded electrospun composite nanofibrous mats developed in this study may find various applications in tissue engineering and pharmaceutical sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据