4.3 Article

Poly(ionic liquid) brush coated electrospun membrane: a useful platform for the development of functionalized membrane systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 39, 页码 8617-8623

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm01179g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20473044, 20533050]
  2. MOST [2006CB806200]
  3. Transregional Project [TRR61]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20060390444]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, poly(ionic liquid) brushes were successfully grafted to the electrospun SiO(2) nanofiber surface with atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) technology. By adjusting the density of initiator sites on the nanofiber surface, the core-shell structure was fabricated, which could clearly be seen with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Combining the unique properties of an ionic liquid and electrospun nanofibrous mat, this hierarchically structured membrane provides a useful platform for developing functionalized membrane systems. With counteranion exchange of the attached poly(ionic liquid) brushes, the properties and functionality of the prepared membrane can be easily adjusted or integrated on need. As a demonstration, such a membrane served as an nion-directed molecular gating system. With counteranion exchange, the surface properties of the membrane were reversibly altered between hydrophilic to hydrophobic, which makes pores withdraw or expel solvent molecules (H(2)O), thus controlling the transport of probe molecules through the membrane. As a further example, electroactive polyoxometalate (POM) units were incorporated into the membrane through simple counteranion exchange, and a functionalized membrane with electroactivity was also achieved. In this work, various characterization techniques including infrared spectroscopy (IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical measurements were used to characterize the related membrane systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据