4.3 Article

Hollow polymeric microspheres grafted with optically active helical polymer chains: Preparation and their chiral recognition ability

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 781-789

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b918132f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0096]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [20574004, 20974007]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20060010001]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0706]
  5. Beijing Municipal Education Commission (BMEC) [XK 100100433, XK100100540]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel class of hollow polymeric microspheres was prepared from optically active helical polymers. To prepare the hollow spheres, optically active helical N-propargylamide copolymers (OAHPs) containing specially designed C=C groups in pendent groups, were first synthesized and subsequently used as a macromonomer. Polymeric particles based on maleic anhydride (MAH) and vinyl acetate were prepared and used as sacrificial templates for the subsequent preparation of core/shell spheres, which were accomplished by using the system consisting of MAH, divinyl benzene and OAHP macromonomers. After extracting the core in the prepared core/shell particles, hollow microspheres grafted with optically active helical polymer chains were successfully obtained. The hollow particles were characterized with FTIR, field-emission SEM and TEM measurements. The size and the shell thickness of these hollow spheres were readily controllable. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded on the hollow spheres dispersed in THF. The intense CD effects indicated that the hollow spheres possessed high optical activity, arising from the helical polymer chains. The preferential adsorption of (R)-(+)-1-phenylethylamine to the (S)-form by the obtained hollow spheres clearly attested to the chiral recognition ability of the novel spheres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据