4.3 Article

Tin(IV) phosphonates: porous nanoparticles and pillared materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 17, 页码 2593-2603

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b818618a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-0332453, DMR-0652166]
  2. R. A. Welch Foundation [A-0673]
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of tin(IV) phosphonates have been prepared; monophosphonates that form porous spherical aggregates and diphosphonates that form layered three-dimensional structures. The reaction of 4,4'-monophenyldiphosphonic acid with SnCl4 center dot 5H(2)O in a solvothermal reaction produces pillared layered porous materials with surface areas of 350-450 m(2) g(-1) and pore sizes in the 8-20 angstrom range. The isotherms are type I in character. With biphenyldiphosphonic acid, preparation in water-alcohol solutions also yields porous pillared materials but the isotherms are type IV. The pores are somewhat larger and the pore distribution range is also larger. However, carrying out the reactions in DMSO-water or DMSO alcohol, yields porous materials with type I isotherms. The use of spacer groups such as methyl, phenyl and phosphite were found to change the pore structure and/or to increase the surface area. The structure of these porous materials cannot be determined directly as they yield minimal X-ray powder patterns. However, the structure of Sn(O3PCH3)(2) was determined from its powder pattern obtained from a sample treated hydrothermally at 220 degrees C for 30 days. The structure is indeed layered with pendant methyl groups forming a bilayer similar to the structure of zirconium phenylphosphonate. Using these structures to describe the porous pillared compounds led to a hypothesis of layer growth of these materials that explains their properties and their unique type of porosity. The usefulness of these porous materials resides in their ability to be functionalized to impart chemical reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据