4.3 Article

Direct and low energy electrolytic co-reduction of mixed oxides to zirconium-based multi-phase hydrogen storage alloys in molten salts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 18, 页码 2803-2809

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b820560d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC
  2. EPSRC [20573081, 20773094, EP/F026412/1]
  3. National Key Fundamental R&D Program of China [2007CB613801]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F026412/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct synthesis of Zr-based AB(2)-type hydrogen storage alloys (HSAs) from mixed oxide precursors has been achieved by electrolysis in molten CaCl2 at 900 degrees C and a cell voltage below 3.2 V. The process resembled direct oxide-to-metal conversion in solid state, and the target alloys, namely ZrCr2, ZrCr0.7Ni1.3 and Zr0.5Ti0.5V0.5Cr0.2Ni1.3, were formed in situ during electrolysis without going through any melting step. Electrolysis energy consumption could be as low as 9.59 kWh (kg-HSA)(-1) and the metal recovery yield was generally higher than 90%. The electrolytic products were readily obtained as powders with the designated compositions and crystal structures (e.g. the C14 and C15 Laves phases). More importantly, these Zr-based electrolytic HSA powders were composed of nodular micro-particles which are very desirable for fabrication of electrodes with micro-porosity to facilitate electrolyte ex-and ingression. Galvanostatic discharge-charge tests of the as-prepared electrolytic HSA powders resulted in similar or higher hydrogen storage capacities (up to 280 mAh g(-1)) in comparison with the same HSAs prepared by e. g. arc-melting the individual metals as reported in literature. Particularly, the electrolytic Zr-based HSAs were unique for their high initial capacities without any pre-treatment for activation, and they also exhibited highly satisfactory discharge rate capability with less than 20% capacity loss when the discharge current increased from 50 to 600 mA g(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据