4.5 Article

Polar outflow from the Arctic Ocean: A high resolution model study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
卷 83, 期 1-2, 页码 14-37

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.06.007

关键词

Arctic Ocean; Canadian Arctic Archipelago; Labrador Sea; Nordic Seas; Polar outflows; Pacific water; Lower Halocline Water; Oceanic transports; Sea ice; Ocean modelling

资金

  1. RAPID Climate Change Programme
  2. Arctic Synoptic Basin-wide Oceanography Consortium, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), UK
  3. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1022472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010012, NE/D006201/1, noc010005] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [noc010005, NE/D006201/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arctic fresh water plays a large role in both the global ocean circulation and the hydrological cycle. To identify sources and pathways of the Arctic outflow into the North Atlantic, results of a high resolution global model and observations have been examined. It is shown that continental runoff and snowmelt are the dominant sources of Arctic fresh water. The simulations demonstrated that the oceanic transports account for the majority of the fresh water export from the Arctic into the North Atlantic. The oceanic outflow from the Arctic is split between the western route through the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and the eastern route through the Nordic Seas. Two thirds of total oceanic fresh water comes via the western route. Arctic halocline waters are present on both the western and eastern routes with the western route providing most of the Arctic upper halocline water. Sea ice export contributes more than half the total freshwater flux east of Greenland and less than one fifth of the freshwater flux west of it. Pacific water constitutes about third of the outflow of the Arctic upper halocline water into the North Atlantic. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据