4.2 Article

Establishment and development of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) after oral inoculation with parasite eggs

期刊

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 571-575

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.08.006

关键词

Echinococcus multilocularis; Microtus arvalis; Protoscolices

资金

  1. EMIDA, Era-Net under the EU-FP7

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmission of the zoonotic tapeworm, Echinococcus multilocularis mainly occurs between the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and various species of vole. Micron's arvalis is considered one of the key intermediate hosts in Europe. We infected 21 M. arvalis aged 35 days (n = 2), 56 days (n = 6), 84 days (n = 4) and 263 days (n = 9) with 100 E. multilocularis eggs. Four voles aged 263 days were euthanized at 6 weeks post inoculation (wpi) with the remainder euthanized 10 wpi for analysis of metacestode growth and protoscolex development. Eight C57BL/6j mice (age 35-231 days) were included as controls for egg viability (they have been shown to exhibit visible infection after 4 wpi) and dissected at 6 (n = 2) and 10 (n = 6) wpi. M. arvalis had significantly higher metacestode establishment (p = 0.008) 6 wpi with 27.5 +/- 6.63 S.D. compared to C57BL/6j with 15.5 +/- 0.71 S.D. Multivesiculation precluded enumeration at 10 wpi in M. arvalis. No protoscolices were found in metacestodes in M. arvalis 6 wpi or C57BL/6j at any time point but were found in all infected voles 10 wpi (48,056 +/- 52,574 S.D.). It has been reported that glucocorticoid (GC) profile can affect E. multilocularis establishment. This was assessed by measuring corticosterone in rodent hair to determine if parasite establishment or fertility was related to this stress hormone. No significant differences were found. Data presented here provides, for the first time, a protoscolex development window in this species that has the potential to shed light on the epizootiology of this parasite. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据