4.6 Article

The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 141-177

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300306

关键词

big data; data growth; information artifact; information governance; information life cycle management; information management; information risk; information value; IT governance

资金

  1. Global Information Industry Center at the University of California, San Diego
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. ATT
  4. Cisco Systems
  5. IBM
  6. Intel
  7. LSI
  8. Oracle
  9. Seagate
  10. Loyola University Maryland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, chief information officers have begun to report exponential increases in the amounts of raw data captured and retained across the organization. Managing extreme amounts of data can be complex and challenging at a time when information is increasingly viewed as a strategic resource. Since the dominant focus of the information technology (IT) governance literature has been on how firms govern physical IT artifacts (hardware, software, networks), the goal of this study is to extend the theory of IT governance by uncovering the structures and practices used to govern information artifacts. Through detailed interviews with 37 executives in 30 organizations across 17 industries, we discover a range of structural, procedural, and relational practices used to govern information within a nomological net that includes the antecedents of these practices and their effects on firm performance. While some antecedents enable the speedy adoption of information governance, others can delay or limit the adoption of information governance practices. Once adopted, however, information governance can help to boost firm performance. By incorporating these results into an extended theory of IT governance, we note how information governance practices can unlock value from the ever-expanding mountains of data currently held within organizations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据