4.6 Article

Identification of Risk Management System in Construction Industry in Pakistan

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 42-49

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000122

关键词

Construction industry; Construction site; Risk management; Risk management techniques; Joint risk management; Stakeholder; Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Risk management is a relatively new field in the construction industry of Pakistan, but it is gradually gaining prominence because of increased construction activity and competitiveness. This is an empirical survey-based study of risk management in the construction industry of Pakistan. It reports the findings of the importance of risks, their current management techniques, the existing status of risk management systems of the organizations, and barriers to effective risk management from the perspective of key stakeholders. The analysis of the results reveals that financial and economic factors, followed by quality, are the most important risks, and the industry generally tries to avoid or transfer these risks. Results indicated that the risk management system and practices of most of the organizations are reactive, semipermanent, informal, and unstructured with nonexistent and limited committed resources to deal with risks. Nonetheless, the results of interviews indicate that there is awareness about risk management and a desire to learn from past mistakes. The study concludes that the major barriers to effective risk management are the lack of a formal risk management system and the lack of a mechanism for joint risk management by the parties. Insights and discussions are given in the analysis, which are valuable to planners, project managers, supervisors, and other stakeholders. Finally, this work can be used in exploring mechanisms for joint risk management by prospective stakeholders. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000122. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据