4.2 Article

Phylogeography of the western jumping mouse (Zapus princeps) detects deep and persistent allopatry with expansion

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 1016-1029

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-006.1

关键词

genetic diversity; jumping mice; Rocky Mountains; Sierra Nevada; species distribution model; Zapus princeps

类别

资金

  1. Grinnell Resurvey Project (Yosemite Fund)
  2. Grinnell Resurvey Project (National Geographic Society) [8190-07]
  3. Grinnell Resurvey Project (National Science Foundation) [DEB 0640859]
  4. Beringian Coevolution Project (National Science Foundation) [0415668]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [0415668] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how diversity is partitioned across the landscape provides perspectives on the environmental processes that have influenced the evolutionary history of organisms. We analyzed spatial demography, historical biogeography, and niche divergence of the western jumping mouse (Zapus princeps) using molecular sequence data from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA recovered from 7 of the 11 subspecies in western North America. Phylogeographic structure within Z. princeps was partitioned across 5 clades (Boreal, Northern Sierra, Southern Rockies, Southern Sierra, and Uinta). Two lineages detected in the Sierra Nevada of California (Northern Sierra and Southern Sierra) were more closely allied to Z. trinotatus than to other lineages of Z. princeps and species distribution models mirror these phylogenetic signatures by detecting wide overlap in niches for Sierran jumping mice and Z. trinotatus as compared to other Z. princeps. Four southern lineages are deeply divergent and limited to disjunct mesic and montane habitats within the xeric southwestern United States, whereas the 5th lineage is widespread, extending from Wyoming to Alaska and reflecting expansion northward following deglaciation, a common pattern in boreal mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据