4.2 Article

Examination of nuclear loci across a zone of mitochondrial introgression between Tamias ruficaudus and T. amoenus

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 1389-1400

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-082.1

关键词

gene flow; hybridization; introgression; microsatellites; speciation; Tamias

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0717426]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P20 RR16448]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of hybridization in animal evolution has become controversial. Gene flow between divergent taxa can strongly influence processes of great interest to evolutionary biologists, such as speciation and adaptation. Mitochondria] DNA (mtDNA) introgression is a commonly observed, yet particularly poorly understood consequence of hybridization between divergent taxa. Several known cases of mtDNA introgression exist that are heterogeneous in time and space, and it is unknown whether this represents the influence of extrinsic factors, such as selection and demographic fluctuation, or more intrinsic ones, such as cytonuclear interactions or the mosaic evolution of reproductive isolation. It is usually assumed, on the basis of the apparent lack of hybrids at zones of contact, that this phenomenon is unaccompanied by further admixture at nuclear loci, although this assumption rarely is tested. We present an analysis of population structure and gene flow across a zone of mitochondrial introgression between 2 nonsister species of chipmunk (Sciuridae: Tamias). We examined patterns of variation in I 1 nuclear markers (10 microsatellites and 1 sequence-based marker) and compared them with previously identified patterns of mtDNA variation. We found little evidence of nuclear gene flow but some correspondence of introgression with microsatellite population structure. This work suggests that a complex interaction of ecological and genetic factors could have structured introgression of mtDNA in this system. DOI: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-082.1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据