4.2 Article

HOME RANGE AND LANDSCAPE USE OF COYOTES IN A METROPOLITAN LANDSCAPE: CONFLICT OR COEXISTENCE?

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 90, 期 5, 页码 1045-1057

出版社

ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
DOI: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-277.1

关键词

Canis latrans; Chicago; coyote; Illinois; resource selection; urbanization

类别

资金

  1. Cook County Animal and Rabies Control
  2. Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation
  3. Forest Preserve District of Cook County

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An understanding of how top mammalian carnivores respond to urbanization is important for conservation and management of human-wildlife conflicts. Coyotes (Canis latrans) have recently become more prevalent in many metropolitan areas; however, their apparent success is poorly understood. We estimated home-range size and selection of land-use types for coyotes in a heavily urbanized landscape, with a particular focus on responses of coyotes to those parts of the urban landscape with high levels of human development or activity. Mean (+/- SE) annual home ranges of transient coyotes ((X) over bar = 26.80 +/- 2.95 km(2)) were larger than those of resident coyotes ((X) over bar = 4.95 +/- 0.34 km(2).), and home-range size for resisdent coyotes did not vary among seasons or between age and sex classes. Although most home ranges were associated with natural patches of habitat, there was considerable variation among coyotes, with some home ranges entirely lacking patches of natural habitat. Within home ranges, coyotes typically avoided land-use types associated with human activity (i.e., Residential, Urban Grass, and Urban Land) regardless of coyote characteristics, seasons, and activity periods. Few coyotes were nuisances, and conflicts occurred when coyotes were sick or exposed to wildlife feeding by humans. We found little evidence that coyotes were attracted to areas associated with hurnan activity, despite at times having home ranges located in heavily developed areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据