4.2 Review

THE RELATIONSHIPS OF MAJOR LINEAGES WITHIN PEROMYSCINE RODENTS: A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESIS AND SYSTEMATIC REAPPRAISAL

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 1279-1295

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-195.1

关键词

Baiomyini; classification; Neotominae; Ochrotomyini; Peromyscini; Peromyscus; phylogeny; Reithrodontomyini; rodents; systematics

类别

资金

  1. Royal Ontario Museum (MDE)
  2. Connaught Foundation
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program
  4. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peromyscine mice of the crecetid subfamily Neotominae comprise the most common and speciose assemblage of North American rodents. The composition and Phylogenetic relationships within this group have been addressed using multiple character systems but remain unresolved, particularly the branching pattern of deeply rooted lineages. The relationships and status of several taxa formerly included within Peromyscus also are controversial. We present a new phylogenetic hypothesis based on combined mitochondrial and nuclear sequences using cytochrome b. interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein. and growth hormone receptor gene sequences. and include all major peromyscine lineages. Bayesian and parsimony approaches recover a congruent, well-resolved phylogeny, wherein Peronniscus forms a monophyletic assemblage only if a number of putative genera are included within it. Onychomys rather than Reithrodontomys is the sister taxon to Peromyscus (within which are included Habromys, Osgoodomys, Megadontmys, Podomys, and Neotomodon). Reithrodontomys in turn is the sister taxon to Isthmomys, and these 2 genera are the nearest outlier to Onychomys plus an expanded concept of Peromyscus, consistent with the recent recognition of this entire group as the tribe Reithrodontomyini. The Baiomyini, Ochrotomyini, and Neotoma (Neotomini) appear as successive outgroups to this clade. Based on these results, we present a systematic review of higher-level relationships among peromyscine rodents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据