4.2 Article

Indirect fitness benefits do not compensate for the loss of direct fitness in yellow-bellied marmots

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 874-881

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-146.1

关键词

age of 1st reproduction; costs of reproduction; direct fitness; inclusive fitness; indirect fitness; life-history theory; Marmota flaviventris; reproductive strategy; reproductive suppression; yellow-bellied marmot

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB02-24953, G-16354, GB-1980, GB-6123, GB-32494, BMS74-21193, DEB78-07327, BSR-8121231, BSR-9614690, BSR-9006772]
  2. Florida Agricultural Research Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contribution of indirect fitness to inclusive fitness is expected to increase as the reproductive skew increases, with indirect fitness being the only component Of Inclusive fitness of sterile individuals in eusocial species. However, the relative contribution of indirect fitness to inclusive fitness has rarely been evaluated empirically. Using data from a long-term study (1962-2003). we show that female yellow-bellied marmots that have a later age of 1st successful reproduction incur a substantial loss of direct fitness with no corresponding gain in indirect fitness. Additionally. although females that survive to reproductive age but do not successfully reproduce have a greater indirect fitness than those that reproduce at least once, indirect fitness benefits of foregoing reproduction are insufficient to compensate for the loss of direct fitness resulting from later reproduction. Although indirect fitness composed 22.2% of the inclusive fitness of females that reproduced at least once, females that reproduced Lit least once had 2.3 times higher inclusive fitness than those that survived to reproductive age but never reproduced. These results suggest that, in yellow-bellied marmots and other species with similar life histories, the contribution of indirect fitness to inclusive fitness does not compensate for loss of direct fitness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据