4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

GMR sensors and magnetic nanoparticles for immuno-chromatographic assays

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
卷 324, 期 21, 页码 3495-3498

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.074

关键词

Magnetic biosensor; Lateral-flow assay; Giant magnetoresistive sensor (GMR); Magnetic nanoparticle; Nanoparticle functionalization; hCG hormone detection

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science [NAN2004-09270-CO3-03, PROFIT CIT 010000-2007-27, INNPACTO IPT-010000-2010-2, CONSOLIDER NANOBIOMED]
  2. Aragon Autonomic Government (DGA)
  3. FCT through the Associated Laboratory-Institut de Nanotecnologias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional tests based on immunorecognition and on the use of coloured colloidal particles have still some drawbacks that limit their use: they do not provide a quantitative determination of the analyte, and their sensitivity is limited. Our strategy to overcome these disadvantages consists in the use of superparamagnetic core-shell nanoparticles to tag the analyte. The use of these magnetic labels allows us to quantify the amount of analyte present in our sample with a very high sensitivity, detecting their magnetic response by means of the suitable magnetic sensor. Our method is based on measuring the magnetoresistive response of a spin-valve giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensor placed in proximity to the magnetic nanoparticles present in the lateral flow strip. Here, a brief description of our prototype and of the measurement procedure will be presented, as well as preliminary assays using our biosensor to detect the hCG pregnancy hormone in a solution. A crucial aspect to take into account in order to increase the sensitivity is the proper functionalisation of the nanoparticle shell, in order to achieve an oriented immobilisation of the antibodies to be used in the immunorecognition process. Several strategies to further increase the sensor sensitivity are suggested. (C) 2012 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据