4.5 Article

Structural and magnetic properties of Mn-doped ZnO powders

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
卷 323, 期 16, 页码 2202-2205

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.03.031

关键词

Mn-doped ZnO; Oxygen vacancy; Room temperature ferromagnetism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mixture of bi(acetylacetonato) zinc(II)hydrate and tris(acetylacetonato) manganese(III) complexes was thermally co-dissociated to synthesize Mn-doped ZnO powders. In order to examine the effect of oxygen vacancies on the ferromagnetic coupling of Mn ions, two preparation routes were used: in route (I) the preparation was done in an open environment, whereas in route (II) the preparation was done in a closed environment. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) and the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements indicate that the Mn content in the three samples are 3.9% (I), 3.3% (II) and 4.2% (II). The XRD results showed that the Mn ions were incorporated in the ZnO crystal and that a Zn1-xMnxO solid solution has formed. The magnetic characterization indicated that only samples prepared via route (II) exhibited a room temperature ferromagnetic component of magnetization. Furthermore, magnetic analysis showed that the magnetic moment per dopant ion in the samples examined was in the range of 4.2-6.1 mu(B)/Mn. The percentages of coupled Mn atoms to the total number of Mn atoms were found to be extremely small (less than 0.1%), which by itself cannot explain the observed RT hysteresis loops. Thus, in order to produce long-range ferromagnetic order in these samples, the FM coupling has to be mediated via defects. The observed FM in this study may be attributed to the presence of oxygen vacancies, which mediate the ferromagnetic exchange between the coupled Mn ions. This is consistent with the bound magnetic polarons (BMP) model where defects like oxygen vacancies cause the polarons to overlap and give rise to a long-range ferromagnetic order in dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMS). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据