4.7 Article

Sensitivity of Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion MRI to Pharmacologically Induced Perfusion Changes in Rat Kidneys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 1124-1128

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24645

关键词

renal perfusion; ASL; rat kidney; adenosine; L-NAME; MRI

资金

  1. NIH [R01-DK053221]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000430] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK053221] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo investigate whether arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is sensitive to changes by pharmacologically induced vasodilation and vasoconstriction in rat kidneys. Materials and MethodsChanges in renal cortical blood flow in seven rats were induced by adenosine infusion (vasodilation) and L-NAME injection (vasoconstriction). All imaging studies were performed on a 3 Tesla scanner using a FAIR-TrueFISP sequence for the ASL implementation. The acquisition time for each ASL scan was 6 min. Cortical perfusion rates were calculated using regions of interest analysis, and the differences in perfusion rates during baseline, vasodilation, and vasoconstriction were compared and assessed for statistical significance. ResultsCompared with the baseline, an average of 94 mL/100 g/min increase and 157 mL/100 g/min decrease in cortical perfusion was observed following adenosine infusion and L-NAME administration, respectively. The changes in cortical perfusion were significant between baseline and vasodilation (P<0.05), baseline and vasoconstriction (P<0.01), and vasodilation and vasoconstriction (P<0.01). ConclusionASL is sensitive to pharmacologically induced perfusion changes in rat kidneys at doses comparable to current use. The preliminary results suggest the feasibility of ASL for investigating renal blood flow in a variety of rodent models. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:1124-1128. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据