4.4 Article

Fluorescence-guided surgery, but not bright-light surgery, prevents local recurrence in a pancreatic cancer patient derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

期刊

PANCREATOLOGY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 295-301

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.02.008

关键词

Fluorescence-guided surgery; Pancreatic cancer; Patient derived orthotopic xenograft; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CEA; PDOX

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA132971, 142669]
  2. JSPS [26830081, 26462070, 24592009]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592009, 26462070, 26830081] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine (GEM) in combination with fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) on a pancreatic cancer patient derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. Methods: A PDOX model was established from a CEA-positive tumor from a patient who had undergone a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mice were randomized to 4 groups: bright light surgery (BLS) only; BLS + NAC; FGS only; and FGS + NAC. An anti-CEA antibody conjugated to DyLight 650 was administered intravenously via the tail vein of mice with a pancreatic cancer PDOX 24 h before surgery. Results: The PDOX was clearly labeled with fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody. Only one out of 8 mice had local recurrence in the FGS only group and zero out of 8 mice had local recurrence in the FGS + NAC which was significantly lower than BLS only or BLS + NAC mice, where local disease recurred in 6 out of 8 mice in each treatment group (p = 0.041 and p = 0.007, respectively). NAC did not significantly reduce recurrence rates when combined with either FGS or BLS. Conclusion: These results indicate that FGS can significantly reduce local recurrence compared to BLS in pancreatic cancer resistant to NAC. Copyright (C) 2015, IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据