4.7 Article

Characterization of Thalamo-cortical Association Using Amplitude and Connectivity of Functional MRI in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 1558-1568

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24310

关键词

fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation; functional connectivity (fcMRI); coherence; mild traumatic brain injury; thalamus; resting-state fMRI

资金

  1. NIH-RO1 [NS039135-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo examine thalamic and cortical injuries using fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFFs) and functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) based on resting state (RS) and task-related fMRI in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). Materials and MethodsTwenty-seven patients and 27 age-matched controls were recruited. The 3 Tesla fMRI at RS and finger tapping task were used to assess fALFF and fcMRI patterns. fALFFs were computed with filtering (0.01-0.08 Hz) and scaling after preprocessing. fcMRI was performed using a standard seed-based correlation method, and delayed fcMRI (coherence) in frequency domain were also performed between thalamus and cortex. ResultsIn comparison with controls, MTBI patients exhibited significantly decreased fALFFs in the thalamus (and frontal/temporal subsegments) and cortical frontal and temporal lobes; as well as decreased thalamo-thalamo and thalamo-frontal/ thalamo-temporal fcMRI at rest based on RS-fMRI (corrected P < 0.05). This thalamic and cortical disruption also existed at task-related condition in patients. ConclusionThe decreased fALFFs (i.e., lower neuronal activity) in the thalamus and its segments provide additional evidence of thalamic injury in patients with MTBI. Our findings of fALFFs and fcMRI changes during motor task and resting state may offer insights into the underlying cause and primary location of disrupted thalamo-cortical networks after MTBI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1558-1568. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据