4.7 Article

MR Elastography for Noninvasive Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis: Reproducibility of the Examination and Reproducibility and Repeatability of the Liver Stiffness Value Measurement

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 326-331

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24147

关键词

magnetic resonance elastography; liver fibrosis; reproducibility of results

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0026127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo determine the reproducibility of MR elastography (MRE) and the reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurement of MRE in the staging of liver fibrosis. Materials and MethodsNinety-four patients, who underwent liver MRE, were included in this study. The patients were classified into group 1 (n=47) and group 2 (n=47) according to our knowledge of their histologic hepatic fibrosis (HF) stage. To analyze the reproducibility of MRE, the group 1 patients underwent MRE twice. In addition, to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the stiffness measurement of MRE, a single observer measured the stiffness values of the second MREs in group 1 twice, and two observers independently measured the stiffness values of MRE in group 2. A 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of MRE. ResultsIn group I, there was no significant difference in the mean liver stiffness values of the first and second MRE examinations, i.e., 3.450.25 kPa vs. 3.35 +/- 0.23 kPa (p=0.22). The reproducibility of the MRE examination and the reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurement were high, i.e., the ICCs of each parameter were 0.945, 0.827, and 0.963, respectively, and the 95% limits of agreement were 25.3%, 35.35%, and 18.0%, respectively. ConclusionMRE is a promising tool for evaluating HF and has high reproducibility of the examination as well as reproducibility and repeatability of the stiffness measurements. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:326-331. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据