4.7 Review

MR spectroscopic imaging: Principles and recent advances

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1301-1325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23945

关键词

MR spectroscopic imaging; chemical shift imaging; spatial and spectral encoding; spatial prelocalization; spectral quantification; echo-planar spectroscopic imaging; parallel imaging; compressed sensing; human; brain; breast

资金

  1. NIH [1 R01 DA14178-01, RO1 EB00822, R01 MH081864, RC1 MH088507, RO1 NS036524, ARRA-1R01HD065283, 1P50 HD055782]
  2. MIND Research Network (DOE Grant) [DE-FG02-99ER62764]
  3. University of New Mexico School of Medicine Brain and Behavioral Illness Signature Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) has become a valuable tool for quantifying metabolic abnormalities in human brain, prostate, breast and other organs. It is used in routine clinical imaging, particularly for cancer assessment, and in clinical research applications. This article describes basic principles of commonly used MRSI data acquisition and analysis methods and their impact on clinical applications. It also highlights technical advances, such as parallel imaging and newer high-speed MRSI approaches that are becoming viable alternatives to conventional MRSI methods. Although the main focus is on 1H-MRSI, the principles described are applicable to other MR-compatible nuclei. This review of the state-of-the-art in MRSI methodology provides a framework for critically assessing the clinical utility of MRSI and for defining future technical development that is expected to lead to increased clinical use of MRSI. Future technical development will likely focus on ultra-high field MRI scanners, novel hyperpolarized contrast agents using metabolically active compounds, and ultra-fast MRSI techniques because these technologies offer unprecedented sensitivity and specificity for probing tissue metabolic status and dynamics. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:13011325. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据