4.7 Article

Association Between Iron Content and Gray Matter Missegmentation With Voxel-Based Morphometry in Basal Ganglia

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 958-962

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23916

关键词

basal ganglia; brain volumetry; iron content; magnetic resonance imaging; missegmentation; voxel-based morphometry

资金

  1. The Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22591316, 221S0003] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo show an association between T2-weighted signal intensity (T2-SI) variation and missegmentation in the putamen of healthy adults, using 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance scanner and voxel-based morphomery (VBM). Materials and MethodsContiguous sagittal T1-weighted images and axial T2-weighted images of the brain were obtained from 1380 healthy participants using a 3.0 Tesla (T) MR scanner. After image preprocessing with Statistical Parametric Mapping 5, the association between T2-SI ratio (= A/B, where A is the mean of the T2-SI in the putamen, and B is that in the thalamus) variation and gray matter missegmentation was assessed using VBM. ResultsA significant positive correlation was revealed between T2-SI ratio and bilateral putamen volume on the gray matter images. In addition, we found a significant negative correlation between T2-SI ratio and bilateral putamen volume on the white matter images. We consider that these results show the influence of missegmentation. ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first VBM study to demonstrate an association between T2-SI variation and gray matter missegmentation. These results indicate the possibility that VBM may be more affected by individual differences in iron content levels than by individual differences in tissue volumes if detected-regions with VBM contained substantial iron deposition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;38:958-962. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据